首页
热点

内幕:大药厂对持不同意见的医生进行追捕

发布时间: 2021-12-06 17:13:59    阅读:487  约63 分钟阅读     

内幕:大药厂对持不同意见的医生进行追捕
图片说明:示意图    图片来源:Public Domain(公有领域)
【中国观察2021年12月06日讯】

当法院阻止拜登强制疫苗令后,拜登无视法律判决继续推疫苗。这里面涉及了多个主要团体,这些团体在不同角度打击不同意见,将质疑的声音视为国内恐怖主义去处理。这篇文章从这个角度介绍了其中涉及的若干大小打手。 一个是美国医学协会AMA,AMA干的坏事包括,

1,教唆医生如何欺骗患者

2,在法院判决后,AMA无视判决,继续按照拜登命令告诉雇主执行命令

3,AMA负责具体追捕持不同意见的医生,吊销这些医生的执照。 此外,

4,AMA得到了一个叫做NLFD的所谓“反假信息”组织的协助,这个组织由拜登的支持者EverydayAmericaJoe所支持。

5,一个叫做CCDH(反数字仇恨中心)的组织制定了所谓“假消息12人”的名单和报告,列举了网上12个正义人士,说他们要为散步‘假消息’负责。

6,然后NLFD就以CCDH这个报告作为标准,协同AMA一起确定迫害哪些医生。这个名单上甚至包含著名的Rand Paul参议员(他有医生执照,目前正在被威胁取消)。而Ran Paul正是在国会揭露福奇的第一人。

7,这个背后迫害不同意见医生的打手名单还可以很长,还有NIH的高官,国际虚假信息委员会IGCD,各国的DS议员....这个蜘蛛网基本上囊括了整个后台DS。迫害异见者,这是一场针对公众的战争。
我们现在的情况是,对公共卫生措施提出有效的问题被等同于国内恐怖主义行为。这是令人难以置信的,但我们却在这里。在过去的两年里,针对那些质疑使用不科学的大流行病应对措施(如口罩和封锁)的理智性,或分享数据显示Covid基因疗法确实是糟糕的公共卫生政策的人所使用的言辞变得越来越激烈。

约瑟夫-梅科拉博士的分析,2021年11月29日


美国医学会(AMA)明确教导医生在被问及有关Covid、治疗方案和Covid针剂的棘手问题时如何欺骗病人和媒体。

AMA还支持扩大对私人雇员的Covid针剂授权,并与拜登政府一起鼓励拥有100名以上雇员的雇主实施授权,尽管第五巡回法院已经永久阻止了职业安全与健康管理局("OSHA")实施和执行其Covid针剂规则。

第五巡回上诉法院裁定,OSHA的紧急临时标准("ETS")超出了OSHA的权力范围和/或违反了宪法。

美国医学会、全国各州护理委员会和其他主要护理组织威胁那些公开反对Covid措施和/或Covid针剂的医生和护士,要吊销他们的专业执照。

协助他们完成这项任务的是一个名为 "无证造谣 "的自由派前沿组织,该组织由克里斯-吉尔罗伊创建,他是一名营销策略师,还创建了EverydayAmericanJoe网站,致力于支持乔-拜登的总统竞选。

休斯顿卫理公会医生因争议性的Covid推文而被停职后辞职,他发表了自己的看法。
2021年11月17日 (23分钟)
2021年11月4日,拜登政府宣布了两项主要的Covid刺杀政策,针对三分之二的美国工人。1当时,70%的美国成年人据说已经默认了这种新型的基因疗法,但这还不够。

拜登违反美国宪法,责成职业安全与健康管理局("OSHA")制定一项规则,规定所有拥有100名以上员工的雇主必须拥有完全 "接种 "的员工,否则将面临严厉的罚款。

同时,卫生与公众服务部的医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心("CMS")实施了一项要求,强迫参加医疗保险和医疗补助的设施的医护人员全面 "接种疫苗",否则将失去工作。

这两项政策的最后期限是2022年1月4日。正如所预料的那样,OSHA在暗示该政策可能也会扩大到员工人数少于100人的公司之前,没有浪费任何时间。

法院永久性地阻止了OSHA的 "疫苗 "规则
幸运的是,10天后,即2021年11月14日,第五巡回上诉法院永久阻止了OSHA实施和执行其Covid jab规则,理由是紧急临时标准("ETS")超出了OSHA的权力范围和/或违反了宪法。

3 更重要的是,虽然OSHA已经遵守了法院的裁决,暂停了ETS和与之相关的任何活动,但拜登政府仍厚颜无耻地鼓励雇主执行暂停的规则。

美国医学会支持并鼓励无法无天的行为
美国医学会也露出了它的真面目,在这个问题上实际上是站在白宫一边的。是的,美国医学会实际上是在告诉雇主,尽管法院发出了永久禁令,但还是要继续执行这项任务。

从本质上讲,拜登政府和AMA寄希望于第五巡回法院的裁决被推翻--AMA正积极参与这场法律斗争7--但这是一个冒险的游戏。如果裁决得到维持,那些解雇不想打针的员工的公司,即使ETS已经暂停,也会给自己留下各种法律诉讼的机会。

AMA是如何从一个致力于促进医学领域的卓越、诚信和道德的协会,8 到迫害和 "驱逐 "那些遵循他们的良心、健全的医疗实践--以及实际法律的医生?

AMA甚至还指导医生如何对他们的病人和公众撒谎!在其2021年冬季的 "AMA "杂志中,该杂志的内容是:"AMA "是指美国医学会。在其2021年冬季的 "AMA Covid指南。在其2021年冬季的 "AMA Covid指南:关于疫苗、疫苗临床试验和打击疫苗错误信息的背景/信息 "9中,AMA明确教导医生在被问及有关Covid、治疗方案和Covid注射的棘手问题时如何欺骗病人和媒体。


整个指南的目的是教医生如何培养对医疗行业的信心,因为它涉及到Covid的治疗,但特别是涉及到实验性Covid注射。潜在危险的问题被完全忽略了。医生们被告知说这些针剂是安全和有效的。讨论结束。

从什么时候开始,医学专家不需要思考一种新的、从未使用过的实验性治疗方法的潜在危险?在这方面要求盲目信任是前所未有的,也是不合情理的,但这就是我们的现状。

AMA追捕持不同意见的医生
AMA现在正在追捕那些为自己着想、按照良心和法律行事的医生,并与当地医疗委员会合作,剥夺他们的执照。(请记住,由美国食品和药物管理局、疾病控制和预防中心以及职业安全与健康管理局等组织发布的规则和指南不是法律。这些组织都无权制定法律)。

上面的视频是休斯顿卫理公会有医院特权的耳鼻喉科医生玛丽-鲍登的新闻发布会,她在推特上发表了一系列文章,称 "疫苗规定是错误的","伊维菌素有效","鉴于目前的气候和墙上的文字,我正在将我的实践重点转移到治疗未接种疫苗的人 "10。

"如果某人有病,他们就有病。他们是否接种过疫苗有什么区别?你要治疗他们。这就像说你是个吸烟者,我们会让你排在治疗肺癌的队伍后面。这不是医学上的做法。" ~ 玛丽-鲍登医生

根据休斯顿卫理公会的说法,她被停职,等待对她的 "不当行为 "和 "不恰当和不尊重的语言 "进行调查。在一系列推文中,休斯顿卫理公会说:11

"最近加入休斯顿卫理公会医院医务人员的玛丽-鲍登医生正在使用她的社交媒体账户,表达她对科威德疫苗和治疗的个人和政治观点。

"这些对社会有害的意见并不反映可靠的医学证据或休斯顿卫理公会的价值观,我们在那里治疗了超过25,000名Covid住院病人,我们所有的员工和医生都接种了疫苗以保护我们的病人......

"鲍登博士从未在休斯顿卫理公会医院收治过病人,他正在散布危险的错误信息,而这些信息是没有科学依据的。"

他们试图让我成为一个例子
2021年11月17日,鲍登宣布辞职。在她的新闻声明中(见视频),鲍登解释说,她从未在过去两年拥有医院特权的休斯顿卫理公会接纳过任何病人,原因是她在早期积极治疗Covid。她的病人最终都不需要院内或紧急护理。

鲍登说,她对自己的医院特权被暂停感到惊讶。"她说:"作为一名医生,我无权发表我的医学意见,这让我感到震惊。她还说,她 "不欣赏 "休斯顿卫理公会选择的处理方式,公开诋毁她而不是进行面对面的交谈。

她说:"他们本可以非常安静地暂停我的特权,"她说。"相反,他们把事情捅到了媒体上......我想他们是想拿我做个榜样......向人们展示......如果你敢挑战疫苗议程,这就是你的下场......他们把你打倒。"

在休斯顿卫理公会对她的公开评论之后,巨头们一直在她的网站上留下虚假评论,并以各种方式骚扰她。"我不觉得我的一面得到了公平的报道,"她说。鲍登还向KHOU11新闻网辩护说:12

"我从未关闭我的门。在大流行病期间,我每周开放七天。我已经为8万多人进行了Covid测试。我已经为2,000多人治疗了Covid。我一直努力保持在Covid的前面。我一直试图积极主动地治疗我的病人。

"我并不危险。我没有做任何危险的事情。他们把我描绘成那样是荒谬的。我将继续为任何和所有Covid患者看病。我永远不会拒绝有生命危险的人。但是,对于常规的耳鼻喉科[耳朵、鼻子和喉咙]的东西,我打算优先考虑未接种疫苗的人......

"如果某人有病,他们就有病。他们是否接种过疫苗有什么区别?你要治疗他们。这就像说你是个吸烟者,我们会把你放在治疗肺癌的队伍的后面。这不是医学上的做法。"


持不同意见的护士也发现自己受到全国各州护理委员会和其他主要护理组织的迫害,2021年11月16日,这些组织发布了一份联合政策声明13,指出传播 "非科学和误导性的科威德信息 "的护士将被追究责任,并可能面临其护理委员会的纪律处分。

没有虚假信息的许可证--另一个幌子集团
正如我在以前的几篇文章中解释的那样,阿拉贝拉顾问公司--自由派 "黑钱 "网络的营利性中心--经常建立和运行临时性的前沿团体,以促进特定的议程。

现在大多数人都知道,美国肯塔基州参议员兰德-保罗(Rand Paul)本身就是一名医生,他一直是安东尼-福奇医生谎言的主要挑战者,而NLFD现在正指示有意愿的人向肯塔基州医学委员会举报他,目的是让他的医疗执照被吊销16。

NLFD还推动被称为 "打击数字仇恨中心"(CCDH)的黑钱组织传播虚假信息。但是,NLFD是谁?17 在他们网站的最下方,写着 "由EverydayAmericanJoe创建和开发。"18 这里有一张截图,以防他们明智地改变它,因为这有点让人难以理解。


EverydayAmericanJoe是一个致力于支持乔-拜登总统竞选的网站。(截至本文写作时,该网站已被禁用。19)该网站由一位名叫克里斯-吉尔罗伊的营销策略师创建。


每日美国乔:设计中的包容、ADA和残疾,2021年8月8日(4分钟)。
根据他的LinkedIn个人资料,20 吉尔罗伊创建了EverydayAmericanJoe.com,"网上最大的拜登-哈里斯草根网站",是拜登竞选团队的自由职业高级营销顾问和设计师。自2007年以来,他一直是The Microtechs LLC的总裁,这是一家在线营销、网络开发和数字广告公司,生产定制的网站和应用程序,"我们的客户可以自己管理"。

除了EverydayAmericanJoe的线索外,没有迹象表明谁在实际经营NLFD。它只是声称自己是一个 "无党派的美国草根联盟",其目标是让各州的医疗委员会 "保护公众 "免受 "传播医疗虚假信息 "的医疗专业人员的影响。很可能,NLFD是由一个远非无党派的联盟管理的。

毫不奇怪,NLFD所依据的是CCDH的 "虚假信息十人组 "报告,该报告被Facebook谴责为带有偏见和极端的缺陷。21 虽然CCDH声称12个人对社交媒体平台上73%的反疫苗内容负责,但Facebook的一项调查发现,我们总共只占所有疫苗相关内容的0.05%。

很明显,CCDH的存在是为了捏造 "证据",然后用来摧毁反对派以控制信息,而NLFD则依靠这份报告来压制第一修正案的权利。22 事实上,拜登本人也曾公开宣传并依赖这份黑钱的CCDH报告。

美国国立卫生研究院院长呼应IGCD的观点
美国国家卫生研究院院长弗朗西斯-柯林斯博士最近进一步扩大了这个蜘蛛网,他呼吁将任何传播Covid "错误信息 "的人 "绳之以法 "24。

他的模糊威胁与辉瑞公司董事长兼首席执行官阿尔伯特-波拉的威胁如出一辙,他在2021年11月接受大西洋理事会首席执行官弗雷德里克-肯普的采访时说,警告不要打Covid的医学专家是 "罪犯,因为他们实际上已经使数百万人丧生。"25 正如零对冲所指出的:26

"这是一个有趣的基准,因为声称Covid疫苗没有阻止接种者传播Covid曾经被认为是错误的,这现在是一个非常明显的事实。

"究竟什么构成了关于Covid的'错误信息',谁也不知道,因为有几件事情被证明是合理的或真实的,例如武汉实验室背后的病毒来源,曾经被认为是'错误信息'。似乎很可能美国国家卫生研究院、安东尼-福西或辉瑞公司认为是'错误信息'的东西都会成为标准。"

同样的好战言论也来自国际反虚假信息大委员会(IGCD),该委员会的职能是 "信息共享、合作和协调政策的论坛,以......实现民主国家的共同目标"。其中一个目标是审查制度的正常化和合法化,包括医学和科学审查制度。

IGCD的创始人之一是英国议员达米安-柯林斯,他也是CCDH的董事会成员,并且是英国在线安全法案委员会的成员,27 负责审查拟议的 "在线安全法案",一些人警告说这将对言论自由产生灾难性影响。


鉴于所有这些角色之间的联系,我们不会惊讶地发现,英国在线安全法案包括一项规定,即对传播 "明知是不真实的虚假信息 "的 "反疫苗接种者 "判处两年监禁28。

毕竟,这就是该法案的真正目的。它与防止网上欺凌或网上仇恨的传播毫无关系。当然,在未来,这些法律将允许他们压制对任何破坏极权统治的话题的讨论。

对公众的公开战争
我们现在的情况是,对公共卫生措施提出有效的问题被等同于国内恐怖主义行为。这是令人难以置信的,但我们却在这里。在过去的两年里,对于那些质疑使用不科学的大流行病应对措施(如口罩和封锁)是否合理,或分享数据显示Covid基因疗法确实是糟糕的公共卫生政策的人,所用的言辞变得越来越激烈。

例如,多年来一直站在推广各种疫苗前沿的病毒学家Peter Hotez博士,公开呼吁对不同意Covid官方说法的美国公民进行网络战攻击,而且这种卑鄙的言论还发表在所有地方的著名科学杂志《自然》上29。

医生和护士现在正面临着一个站不住脚的局面,他们必须在为病人着想和为极权主义卖命之间做出选择。这根本不可能继续下去。这是不健康的,而且在很多方面都很危险。

虽然令人沮丧和恐惧,但我们都必须坚持不懈地追求和分享真相,我们必须坚持不懈地要求我们的民选代表站出来维护言论自由和其他宪法权利,包括,特别是医生表达他们的医学观点的权利。

资料来源

1, 2 Whitehouse.gov 2021年11月4日
3 国家法律评论 2021年11月14日
4, 6 EHS Today 2021年11月22日
5 ama-assn.org 2021年11月19日
7 ama-assn-org 2021年11月13日
8 AMA使命声明
9 AMA Covid指南
10, 11, 12 KHOU.com 2021年11月16日, 2021年11月17日更新
13 Twitter Taylor Nichols医学博士 2021年11月18日
14 《美国保守派》 2021年5月12日
15 推特 没有虚假信息的许可证
16 Twitter Chass 2021年10月11日
17, 18 nolicenseford isinformation.org
19 everydayamericanjoe.com
20 LinkedIn Chris Gilroy (Archived)
21 Facebook 2021年8月18日
22 Twitter NLFD 2021年10月20日
23 Daily Wire 2021年7月20日
24, 26, 28 Zero Hedge 2021年11月21日
25 Facebook大西洋理事会 2021年11月9日
27 Damiancollins.com 2021年8月11日
29 《自然》 2021年4月27日

作者:罗达-威尔逊,2021年12月6日

Big Pharma Hunts Down Dissenting Doctors

We’re now in a situation where asking valid questions about public health measures are equated to acts of domestic terrorism. It’s unbelievable, yet here we are. Over the past two years, the rhetoric used against those who question the sanity of using unscientific pandemic countermeasures, such as face masks and lockdowns, or share data showing that Covid gene therapies are really bad public health policy, has become increasingly violent.

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola, 29 November 2021

Story at a glance:

  • The American Medical Association (AMA”) explicitly teaches doctors how to deceive patients and the media when asked tough questions about Covid, treatment options and Covid shots. 
  • The AMA also supports expansion of Covid jab mandates for private employees, and together with the Biden administration encourages employers with 100 employees or more to implement mandates even though the Fifth Circuit Court has permanently blocked the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) from implementing and enforcing its Covid jab rule.
  • The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the OSHA emergency temporary standard (“ETS”) exceeds the scope of OSHA’s authority and/or is unconstitutional.
  • The AMA, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing and other leading nursing organisations threaten doctors and nurses who speak out against Covid measures and/or the Covid jab with revocation of their professional licenses.
  • Aiding them in this task is a liberal front group called No License for Disinformation, created by Chris Gilroy, a marketing strategist who also created EverydayAmericanJoe, a website dedicated to supporting Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.
Houston Methodist doctor who resigned following suspension over controversial Covid tweets speaks out,
17 November 2021 (23 mins)

November 4, 2021, the Biden administration announced two major Covid jab policies aimed at two-thirds of American workers.1 At the time, 70% of American adults had supposedly acquiesced to the novel gene therapy, but that was not enough.

In violation of the U.S. Constitution, Biden charged the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) to create a rule that all employers with 100 employees or more must have a fully “vaccinated” staff or face stiff fines.

At the same time, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) at the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) implemented a requirement that forced health care workers at facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid to be fully “vaccinated” or lose their jobs.2

The deadline for both of these policies was January 4, 2022. As predicted, OSHA wasted no time before suggesting that the policy might be expanded to companies with fewer than 100 employees as well.

Court Permanently Blocks OSHA ‘Vaccine’ Rule

Fortunately, 10 days later, November 14, 2021, a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals permanently blocked OSHA from implementing and enforcing its Covid jab rule, on the basis that the emergency temporary standard (“ETS”) exceeded the scope of OSHA’s authority and/or was unconstitutional.

Challenges have been filed in several federal courts, however, so the legal fight is far from over.3 What’s more, while OSHA has complied with the court’s decision, suspending its ETS and any activities related to it, the Biden administration is brazenly encouraging employers to implement the suspended rule nonetheless.4 It’s lawless beyond belief, so employers would be wise to think long and hard before following such dictates.

AMA Sides with and Encourages Lawlessness

The American Medical Association is also showing its true colours, actually siding with the White House on this issue. Yes, the AMA is actually telling employers to go ahead and implement the mandate in spite of the court’s permanent injunction.5,6

Essentially, the Biden administration and the AMA are banking on the Fifth Circuit Court’s decision being overturned — and the AMA is actively involved in this legal fight7 — but that is a risky game. If the ruling is upheld, companies that fired employees who didn’t want to get the shot, even though the ETS had been suspended, leave themselves wide open to all sorts of legal actions.

How did the AMA go from being an association dedicated to promoting excellence, integrity and ethics in the medical field,8 to persecuting and “excommunicating” doctors who follow their conscience, sound medical practice — and the actual law?

The AMA has gone so far as to actually instruct doctors on how to lie to their patients and the public! In its Winter 2021 “AMA Covid Guide: Background/Messaging on Vaccines, Vaccine Clinical Trials & Combatting Vaccine Misinformation,”9 the AMA explicitly teaches doctors how to deceive patients and the media when asked tough questions about Covid, treatment options and Covid shots.

The entire guide is aimed at teaching doctors how to foster confidence in the medical profession in general, as it pertains to treatment of Covid, but in particular as it pertains to the experimental Covid shots. The issue of potential hazards is overlooked altogether. Doctors are told to say the shots are safe and effective. End of discussion.

Since when are medical experts not to ponder the potential hazards of a novel, never-before used experimental treatment? To demand blind faith in this regard is unprecedented and unconscionable, but that’s where we are.

AMA Hunts Down Dissenting Doctors

The AMA is now hunting down doctors who think for themselves and act according to conscience and law, and is working with local medical boards to strip them of their license. (Keep in mind that rules and guidance issued by organisations such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and OSHA are not laws. None of these organisations have the authority to create law.)

The video above features a press conference given by Dr. Mary Bowden, an ear, nose and throat doctor with hospital privileges at Houston Methodist, who was suspended after a series of Twitter posts in which she stated that “Vaccine mandates are wrong,” “Ivermectin works” and “Given the current climate and the writing on the wall, I am shifting my practice focus to treating the unvaccinated.”10

“If someone has an illness, they have an illness. What difference does it make if they have been vaccinated? You’re going to treat them. It’s like saying you’re a smoker, we’ll put you in the back of the line for treating your lung cancer. That’s not the way it goes in medicine.” ~ Dr. Mary Bowden

According to Houston Methodist, she was suspended pending an investigation of her “inappropriate behavior” and “inappropriate and disrespectful language.” In a series of tweets, Houston Methodist said:11

“Dr. Mary Bowden, who recently joined the medical staff at Houston Methodist Hospital, is using her social media accounts to express her personal and political opinions about the Covid vaccine and treatments.

“These opinions, which are harmful to the community, do not reflect reliable medical evidence or the values of Houston Methodist, where we have treated more than 25,000 Covid inpatients, and where all our employees and physicians are vaccinated to protect our patients …

“Dr. Bowden, who has never admitted a patient at Houston Methodist Hospital, is spreading dangerous misinformation which is not based in science.”

‘They’re Trying to Make an Example Out of Me’

November 17, 2021, Bowden announced her resignation. In her press statement (see video), Bowden explained that the reason she never admitted any patients to Houston Methodist, where she’s had hospital privileges for the past two years, was because of her aggressive early treatment of Covid. None of her patients ended up needing in-hospital or emergency care.

Bowden said she was surprised by the suspension of her hospital privileges. “It’s astounding to me, as a physician, that I am not entitled to my medical opinion,” she said. She also said she did “not appreciate” how Houston Methodist chose to handle the situation, publicly vilifying her instead of having a face-to-face conversation.

“They could have suspended my privileges very quietly,” she said. “Instead, they took it to the media … I think they’re trying to make an example out of me … showing people … if you dare challenge the vaccine agenda, this is what happens to you … They beat you down.”

In the wake of Houston Methodist’s public comments about her, trolls have been leaving fake reviews on her website and harassing her in various ways. “I don’t feel I’m getting fair coverage of my side of the story,” she said. Bowden also defended her position to KHOU11 News:12

“I never closed my doors. I was open seven days a week during the pandemic. I’ve tested over 80,000 people for Covid. I’ve treated over 2,000 people for Covid. I’ve tried to stay ahead of Covid. I have tried to be proactive in treating my patients.

“I’m not dangerous. I’m not doing anything dangerous. For them to paint me that way is ridiculous. I will continue to see any and all Covid patients. I would never turn away someone with a life-threatening illness. But for the routine ENT [ear, nose and throat] stuff, I was going to prioritize the unvaccinated …

“If someone has an illness, they have an illness. What difference does it make if they have been vaccinated? You’re going to treat them. It’s like saying you’re a smoker, we’ll put you in the back of the line for treating your lung cancer. That’s not the way it goes in medicine.”

Dissenting nurses are also finding themselves persecuted by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing and other leading nursing organisations, which November 16, 2021, issued a joint policy statement13 stating that nurses who disseminate “non-scientific and misleading Covid information” will be held to account and could face disciplinary action by their board of nursing.

No License for Disinformation — Another Front Group

As I’ve explained in several previous articles, Arabella Advisors — the for-profit hub of a liberal “dark money” network — routinely sets up and runs temporary front groups to promote a specific agenda.14 The No License for Disinformation15 (“NLFD”) group fits this description perfectly.

As most now know, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., a medical doctor in his own right, has been the primary challenger of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s lies, and the NLFD is now instructing willing individuals to report him to the Kentucky Medical Board, with the aim of getting his medical license revoked.16

The NLFD also promotes the false information disseminated by the dark-money group known as the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”). But who are the NLFD?17 At the very bottom of their website, it says, “Created & Developed by EverydayAmericanJoe.”18 Here’s a screenshot of it, just in case they wisen up and change it, because it is more than a little revealing.

EverydayAmericanJoe was a website dedicated to supporting Joe Biden’s presidential campaign. (As of this writing, that site has been disabled.19) The website was created by a marketing strategist named Chris Gilroy.

Everyday American Joe: Inclusion, ADA & Disabilities in Design, 8 August 2021 (4 mins)

According to his LinkedIn profile,20 Gilroy created EverydayAmericanJoe.com, “the largest Biden-Harris grassroots website online,” as a freelance senior marketing consultant and designer for the Biden campaign. Since 2007, he’s been the president of The Microtechs LLC, an online marketing, web development and digital advertising firm that produces custom websites and apps “that our clients can manage themselves.”

Aside from the EverydayAmericanJoe clue, there’s no indication of who is actually running the NLFD. It simply claims to be a “non-partisan grassroots coalition of Americans” whose goal it is to get state medical boards to “protect the public” from medical professionals “who spread medical disinformation.” In all likelihood, the NLFD is run by a coalition that is far from non-partisan. 

Not surprisingly, the NLFD relies on the CCDH’s “Disinformation Dozen” report, which has been denounced as biased and flawed in the extreme by Facebook.21 While the CCDH claims 12 individuals are responsible for 73% of anti-vaccine content on the social media platform, a Facebook investigation found that, collectively, we account for just 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content.

It’s quite clear that the CCDH exists to fabricate “evidence” that is then used to destroy the opposition in order to control the information, and the NLFD relies on this report to suppress First Amendment rights.22 Indeed, Biden himself has publicly promoted and relied on this dark money CCDH report.23

NIH Director Echoes the IGCD

Expanding this spider web a bit further, the National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis Collins recently called for anyone who spreads Covid “misinformation” to be “brought to justice.”24

His nebulous threat echoes that of Pfizer chairman and CEO Albert Bourla who, in a November 2021 interview with Atlantic Council CEO Frederick Kempe, stated that medical professionals who warn against the Covid shot are “criminals, because they have literally cost millions of lives.”25 As noted by Zero Hedge:26

“That’s an interesting benchmark given that it was once considered false to claim that Covid vaccines didn’t stop the vaccinated spreading Covid, which is now an all too obvious fact.

“Quite what constitutes ‘misinformation’ about Covid is anyone’s guess given that several things that turned out to be plausible or true, such as the origin of the virus behind the Wuhan lab, were once deemed to be ‘misinformation.’ It seems likely that whatever the National Institutes of Health, Anthony Fauci or Pfizer deem to be ‘misinformation’ will become the standard.”

The same kind of militant rhetoric is also coming from the International Grand Committee on Disinformation (IGCD), which functions as a “forum for information sharing, collaboration and harmonization of policies to … achieve common goals among democratic states.” One goal in particular is the normalization and legalization of censorship, including medical and scientific censorship.

One of the cofounders of the IGCD was British MP Damian Collins, who also happens to be a CCDH board member, and is part of the U.K.’s Online Safety Bill Committee,27 charged with examining the proposed “Online Safety Bill,” which some have warned would be catastrophic for free speech.

Given the connections between all of these players, we cannot be surprised to find that the U.K. Online Safety Bill includes a provision that would result in a two-year prison sentence for “anti-vaxxers” who spread “false information that they know to be untrue.”28

After all, that’s what the bill is really all about. It has nothing to do with preventing online bullying or the spread of hate online. Of course, in the future, these laws will allow them to silence discussion on any topic that undermines totalitarian rule.

An Open War on the Public

We’re now in a situation where asking valid questions about public health measures are equated to acts of domestic terrorism. It’s unbelievable, yet here we are. Over the past two years, the rhetoric used against those who question the sanity of using unscientific pandemic countermeasures, such as face masks and lockdowns, or share data showing that Covid gene therapies are really bad public health policy, has become increasingly violent.

Dr. Peter Hotez, a virologist who for years has been at the forefront of promoting vaccines of all kinds, for example, has publicly called for cyberwarfare assaults on American citizens who disagree with official Covid narratives, and this vile rhetoric was published in the prestigious science journal Nature, of all places.29

Doctors and nurses are now facing the untenable position of having to choose between doing right by their patients and toeing the line of totalitarianism. This simply cannot go on. It’s profoundly unhealthy and dangerous in a multitude of ways.

While frustrating and intimidating, we must all be relentless in our pursuit and sharing of the truth, and we must relentlessly demand our elected representatives stand up for freedom of speech and other Constitutional rights, including, and especially, the rights of medical doctors to express their medical opinions.

Sources


The Exposé is now censored on
Google, Facebook & Twitter.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

责任编辑:  转载请注明作者、出处並保持完整。

分享 Facebook | X | WhatsApp | LinkedIn

捐助(Paypal): https://www.paypal.me/observeccp
订阅中国观察电报 Telegram : https://t.me/s/ObserveCCP